Available online on 15.03.2026 at ijmspr.com
International Journal of Medical Sciences and Pharma Research
Open Access to Medical Science and Pharma Research
Copyright © 2026 The Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original author and source are credited
| |
Large Splenic Cyst in a 28-Year-Old Nigerian Female: A Case Report
Dr. Godwin Yovwin 1, Dr. Ugochukwu Umeaku 2*, Prof. Obiora J. Uchendu 2
1 Department of Family Medicine, Delta State University Abraka, Delta State, Nigeria.
2 Department of Morbid Anatomy/ Histopathology, Delta State University Abraka, Delta State, Nigeria.
|
Article Info: _________________________________________________ Article History: Received 21 Dec 2025 Reviewed 26 Jan 2026 Accepted 13 Feb 2026 Published 15 March 2026 _________________________________________________ Cite this article as: Yovwin G, Umeaku U, Uchendu OJ, Large Splenic Cyst in a 28-Year-Old Nigerian Female: A Case Report, International Journal of Medical Sciences & Pharma Research, 2026; 12(1):30-32 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/ijmspr.v12i1.176 |
Abstract ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ True splenic cysts are rare, with only a handful of cases available in the English literature. We report a case of a true splenic cyst in a 28-year-old Nigerian female who presented with left upper abdominal pain and fullness. This was confirmed using ultrasound diagnosis and managed with splenectomy, pneumococcal vaccine, and prophylactic oral penicillin treatment. Histological diagnosis revealed a benign splenic cyst. This highlights the need to consider splenic cysts in the differential diagnosis of left upper abdominal pain and the need for further research on the management of patients with such rare disease entities. Keywords: Splenic Cyst, Splenomegaly, Nigerian |
|
*Address for Correspondence: Dr. Ugochukwu Umeaku, Department of Morbid Anatomy/ Histopathology, Delta State University Abraka, Delta State, Nigeria. |
|
INTRODUCTION
The spleen is part of the reticuloendothelial system and the largest unit of the mononuclear phagocyte system, primarily functioning as a filter for blood and in immunological response to blood-borne antigens. Splenic pathologies range from benign causes such as traumatic rupture, cysts, chronic venous congestions, and inflammatory disorders; to malignant disorders such as haemopoietic neoplasms and metastatic diseases.1 Splenic cysts can either be neoplastic or non-neoplastic.1–3 Non-neoplastic splenic cysts can either be post-traumatic, inflammatory, congenital and vascular.1–3 Understanding the pathogenesis and clinical presentation is important in diagnosing and optimally managing these cases. This paper reports a case of a splenic cyst in a 28-year-old Nigerian female.
CASE REPORT
A 28-year-old female was admitted to the surgical department with complaints of left upper abdominal quadrant pain and abdominal fullness of 10 months duration. There was no history of fever and no history of trauma to the abdomen. Physical examination revealed a 10 cm mass in the left upper abdomen. The mass was smooth and moderately tender on palpation. Chest X-ray showed slight upward displacement of the left hemi-diaphragm. Abdominal ultrasound showed a giant solitary cyst within the spleen. A diagnosis of splenic cyst was made, and the patient underwent explorative laparotomy during which splenectomy was performed. Post-operative recovery was uneventful. Gross evaluation showed a solitary splenic cyst of 8 cm diameter, filled with thick gelatinous fluid. The photographs of the splenectomy specimen is shown below. Histological evaluation showed a benign cyst lined by bland epithelium, which was continuous with normal splenic structure. The photomicrograph is attached below. The patient received pneumococcal vaccine and was placed on oral penicillin for 6 months.
Figure 1: Photograph showing the splenctomy specimen.
Figure 2: Photograph showing the cut section of the splenctomy specimen.
Figure 3: Photomicrograph of the splenic cyst wall.
DISCUSSION
Understanding the aetiology of splenic cysts is important in developing effective management and improving patient outcomes. Non-neoplastic cysts can arise in the background of multiple aetiologies, including congenital factors such as remnants of embryonic epithelial tissue, inflammatory (usually from parasites), congenital (example epidermoid cysts), vascular (post-infarction) and pseudocysts (usually post-traumatic).1–5 Early ways of categorizing this disorder depended on whether there was a lining of epithelial cells or not, which suggested it was either something people were born with or caused by an injury respectively.6,7 This method of classifying splenic cyst has caused misunderstanding and incorrect reports because just looking at the lining isn't a good way to judge.6,7 The signs and symptoms of splenic cysts vary depending on the aetiology, size, and location of the cyst.2,8,9 Over time, cysts grow in size due to accumulation of fluid, cellular debris, or other factors, resulting in progressive enlargement. Pain arises as a result of compression of surrounding tissues. Compression of the gastrointestinal tract and respiratory system results in related symptoms such as vomiting, diarrhoea, or changes in bowel habits, and shortness of breathe and cough, respectively.10 Differential diagnosis of splenic cysts includes congenital or acquired true cysts, typically lined by epithelium; pseudocysts, which typically lack epithelial lining and arise in the background of trauma, infarction, or infection; parasitic cysts, typically due to echinococcus; benign neoplastic cysts, such as those seen in lymphangioma or haemangioma; and infectious cysts arising as a result of bacterial, parasitic, or fungal infection.3,11,12 A thorough diagnostic approach, including history taking, physical examination, imaging, serology, and histopathological evaluation, is important in ensuring accurate diagnosis. Abdominal ultrasound is helpful in determining the size, location, and characteristics of the cyst. Computed Tomography (CT) scan further establishes the relationship of the cyst with other organs, in addition to size and location. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) differentiates the types of cysts based on signal intensity and enhancement pattern.10,11 Serology helps exclude echinococcal infections or other causes. Fine-needle aspiration may help exclude infectious or neoplastic cysts and provide fluid for further analysis, such as identification of mucin and epithelial cells. Histopathological evaluation remains the gold standard, although such diagnosis may follow removal of the mass, as seen in this case.2,12 Management of true splenic cysts depends on the size and presence of complications such as rupture and ranges from watchful waiting, cyst aspiration, marsupialization and splenectomy (complete or partial).12 Total splectomy has been the mainstay of treatment for large non-parasitic splenic cysts.7,13 Follow-up is important after splenectomy, particularly due to the risk of infections, especially with encapsulated organisms. In the index case, pneumococcal vaccine and prophylactic penicillin antibiotics for 6 months were administered.12 This is because they are at risk for the development of infections caused by encapsulated bacteria such as Haemophilus, Pneumococcus and Meningococcus organisms.14 The risk of thromboembolism phenomena such as deep vein thrombophlebitis, pulmonary embolism and portal vein thrombosis are also increased in these patients because of elevated platelet count, necessitating the use of prophylactic anticoagulants.14–16 The recommended one is low molecular weight heparin.14
CONCLUSION
Splenic cysts is a cause of splenomegaly and prompt diagnosis is required to identify the cause of the cyst and guide management and improve patient outcome.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no potential conflict of interest concerning the contents, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author Contributions: All authors have equal contributions in the preparation of the manuscript and compilation.
Source of Support: Nil
Funding: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.
Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from the subject involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author
Ethical approval: Not applicable.
REFERENCES
1. O'Malley DP. Atlas of Spleen Pathology. 1st edition. O'Malley DP, editor. New York: Springer; 2013. 75-106 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4672-9_5
2. Shabtaie SA, Hogan AR, Slidell MB. Splenic cysts. Pediatr Ann. 2016;45(7):e251-6. https://doi.org/10.3928/00904481-20160523-01 PMid:27403673
3. Khan Z, Chetty R. A review of the cysts of the spleen. Diagn Histopathol. 2016;22(12):479-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpdhp.2016.10.002
4. Mirilas P, Mentessidou A, Skandalakis JE. Splenic Cysts: Are There So Many Types? J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(3):459-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.012 PMid:17324782
5. Macheras A, Misiako EP, Liakakos T, Mpistarakis D, Fotiadis C, Karatza's G. Non-parasitic splenic cysts: A report of three cases. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11(43):6887. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i43.6884 PMid:16425403 PMCid:PMC4725049
6. Adas G, Karatepe O, Altiok M, Battal M, Bender O, Ozcan D, et al. Diagnostic problems with parasitic and non-parasitic splenic cysts. BMC Surg. 2009;9(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-9-9 PMid:19476658 PMCid:PMC2701920
7. Morgenstern L. Nonparasitic splenic cysts: pathogenesis, classification, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;194(3):306-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(01)01178-4 PMid:11893134
8. Karbasian F, Ataollahi M, Mashhadiagha A, Moosavi SA, Forooghi M, Ansary N, et al. Giant non-parasitic splenic cyst: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2023;17(1):505. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-023-04246-9 PMid:38049884 PMCid:PMC10696752
9. Golmohammadzadeh H, Maddah G, Hojjati YS, Abdollahi A, Shabahang H. Splenic cysts: Analysis of 16 cases. Caspian J Intern Med. 2016;7(3):221.
10. Adas G, Karatepe O, Altiok M, Battal M, Bender O, Ozcan D, et al. Diagnostic problems with parasitic and non-parasitic splenic cysts. BMC Surg. 2009;9(9):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-9-9 PMid:19476658 PMCid:PMC2701920
11. Kamaya A, Weinstein S, Desser TS. Multiple Lesions of the Spleen: Differential Diagnosis of Cystic and Solid Lesions. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI. 2006;27(5):389-403. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2006.06.004 PMid:17048454
12. Hansen MB, Moller AC. Splenic cysts. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004;14(6):316-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sle.0000148463.24028.0c PMid:15599294
13. Gianom D, Wildisen A, Hotz T, Goti F, Decurtins M. Open and Laparoscopic Treatment of Nonparasitic Splenic Cysts. Dig Surg. 2003;20(1):74-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000068860 PMid:12637814
14. Buzelé R, Barbier L, Sauvanet A, Fantin B. Medical complications following splenectomy. J Visc Surg. 2016;153(4):277-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.04.013 PMid:27289254
15. Weledji EP. Benefits and risks of splenectomy. International Journal of Surgery. 2014;12(2):113-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.11.017 PMid:24316283
16. Rottenstreich A, Kleinstern G, Spectre G, Da'as N, Ziv E, Kalish Y. Thromboembolic Events Following Splenectomy: Risk Factors, Prevention, Management and Outcomes. World J Surg. 2018;42(3):675-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4185-2 PMid:28808782